C. S. Lewis and the challenge of ethics in digital society

Authors

  • Lucas Olardi Tarocco Faculdade Católica de Fortaleza (FCF)

Keywords:

C. S. Lewis. Nanoethics. Digital society. Responsibility. Human dignity. Natural law.

Abstract

This paper examines the idea that digital societies lack an ethical framework for understanding and mitigating the impact of digital Technologies on human flourishing and the consequent diminishing of human agency. The authors examine how selected works of C.S. Lewis address man’s moral responsibility while living in a developing society and call for a grounding in metaethical frameworks prior to any outcomes of applied ethics. Each of the authors contributes from his own field of expertise – Mahrik on nanoethics and Neal on digital media – while Lewis’ writing corpus is the shared interest as well as the basis for their research. Writing and thinking from within a metaethical framework he terms the Tao, or natural law, Lewis offers an approach to the dehumanization of digital culture through his own approach to one of the oldest technologies: that of language. This offers the beginning of an infrastructure for thinking about and reacting to digital society in an ethical manner.

Author Biography

Lucas Olardi Tarocco, Faculdade Católica de Fortaleza (FCF)

Graduando em Filosofia pela Faculdade Católica de Fortaleza (FCF).

References

BIRKERTS, S. Changing the subject: art and attention in the internet age. Minneapolis: Graywolf Press, 2015.

DUBOCHET, J. Citizen biologists. The Lausanne experience. EMBO Rep., v. 9, n. 1, 2008, p. 5-9.

GLADNEY, G. Technologizing of the word: toward a theoretical and ethical understanding. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, v. 6, n. 2, 1991, p. 93-105.

GORDIJN, B.; CUTTER, A. M. In pursuit of nanoethics. New York: Springer, 2014.

GREENMAN, J. P.; SCHUCHARDT, R. M., TOLY, N. J. Understanding Jacques Ellul. Eugene: Cascade Books, 2012.

HERZFELD, N. Technology and religion – remaining human in a co-created world. Passadena: Templeton Press, 2009.

KEIPER, A. Nanoethics as a discipline? The New Atlantis, n. 16, 2007, p. 55-67.

KONDRLA, P.; REPAR, P. Ontological consequences of the ethics of technology. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, v. 19, n. 1, 2017, p. 19-24.

LEWIS, C. S. God in the dock: essays on Theology and Ethics. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1970.

LEWIS, C. S. Mere Christianity. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2015.

LEWIS, C. S. Studies in words. London: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

LEWIS, C. S. The abolition of man. New York: HarperCollins, 2001.

MCLUHAN, M. Understanding media: the extention of man. Berkeley: Gingko Press, 2003.

PAVLIKOVA, M. Reading Auden as a resource for existential reflection in a society with technocratic and hedonistic tendencies. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, v. 19, n. 1, 2017, p. 39-43.

POSTMAN, N. Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books, 1993.

RASMUSSEN, A. J.; EBBESEN, M.; ANDERSEN, S. Nanoethics – a collaboration across disciplines. Nanoethics, v. 6, n. 3, 2012, p. 185-193.

ROOT, J.; NEAL, M. The surprising imagination of C.S. Lewis. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2015.

TURCAN, C. Hans Jonas’ ethics of technology: risks of technological society. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, v. 19, n. 1, 2017, p. 35-38.

VALCO, M. Rethinking the role of Kierkegaard’s “Authentic Individual” in liberal capitalist democracies today. European Journal of Science and Theology, v. 11, n. 5, 2015, p. 129-139.

VALCO, M.; BOEHME, A. J. Christian faith and science – can science enhance Theology? European Journal of Science and Theology, v. 13, n. 3, 2017, p. 89-97.

VAN DER LAAN, J. M. Plastic words: words without meaning. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, v. 21, n. 5, 2001, 349-353.

VAN DER LAAN, J. M. Temptation and seduction in the technological milieu. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, v. 24, n. 6, 2004, p. 509-514.

VODICAR, J. Ethics and natural science through Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, v. 19, n. 1), 2017, p. 59-63.

WINOGRAD, T.; FLORES, F. Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional, 1987.

Published

2025-01-13

Issue

Section

Traduções